과천외고 · 최세진 영어 · 베라진(verajin) · 베라딕트(Veradict)

과천외고 1학년 영어 레벨테스트

독해 중심 진단과 실제 과년도 수능 기출을 함께 풉니다. 제출 결과는 선생님 전용 결과함에 저장됩니다.

독해까지 충분히 확인하는 진단

자체 제작 어휘·어법·독해 12문항 + 2025학년도 수능 영어 홀수형 8문항 · 권장 45~55분 · 진단용 동일 배점(각 5점).

기출은 평가원 원문을 새 창에서 읽고 이 화면에 답을 표시합니다. 이 진단의 점수는 수능 원점수·공인 등급·학교 성적 예측이 아닙니다.

평가원 기출 문제지 열기 ↗

응시 정보

이름 또는 선생님과 약속한 학생 코드

연락처·생년월일은 수집하지 않습니다. 답안·점수·소요 시간과 입력한 이름/코드를 최세진 영어 선생님 전용 결과함에 90일간 보관합니다. 다른 학생에게 공개되지 않습니다. 삭제 요청은 카카오채널로 해 주세요.

선택한 과년도 기출을 전에 풀어봤나요?

0 / 20 선택

경과 00:00

PART A · 문장과 독해 진단

하5점 · 어휘 · 문맥 어휘1. 문맥상 sound의 의미로 가장 적절한 것은?

The bridge was temporarily closed after a storm. An engineer said the structure was sound, but the wet surface still needed repair. The town reopened it after the surface had dried and been repaired.

① noisy② structurally safe③ widely known④ easy to hear⑤ recently painted

중5점 · 어휘 · 다의어2. afford의 문맥상 의미는?

The club could afford either a large room or new equipment, but not both. After considering the number of members, it reserved the room and postponed buying equipment.

① repair without help② remember accurately③ announce in public④ have enough money for⑤ borrow without permission

중5점 · 어법 · 수일치·수동태3. 빈칸에 들어갈 말은?

Every report, including those written by the senior students, ( ) checked by the editor before publication.

① are② have③ is④ were⑤ be

중5점 · 어법 · 의미 보존 전환4. 원문의 의미와 어법을 모두 유지한 것은?

Although the instructions were detailed, some beginners needed help.

① Despite the detailed instructions, some beginners needed help.② Despite the instructions were detailed, some beginners needed help.③ Because of the detailed instructions, no beginner needed help.④ Although detailed instructions, some beginners needed help.⑤ Despite of the detailed instructions, some beginners needed help.

중5점 · 독해 · 요지5. 글의 요지로 가장 적절한 것은?

A town library used to place its most frequently borrowed books near the entrance. This arrangement helped visitors who already knew what they wanted, but it gave little attention to unfamiliar titles. The librarian therefore introduced a small display pairing a popular book with a less familiar one on a related subject. She did not remove the usual shelves or require anyone to choose from the display. During the following month, some visitors borrowed books they had not previously considered. The total number of loans changed little, however. The librarian called the trial useful because it widened some readers' choices, not because it produced a dramatic increase in borrowing. Whether the effect would last remained an open question.

① A library must replace familiar books every month.② Higher loan totals are the only sign of a useful display.③ Visitors should be required to try unfamiliar subjects.④ A display proved that all readers prefer new authors.⑤ A display can broaden choices without greatly increasing total loans.

상5점 · 독해 · 추론·범위6. 본문으로 뒷받침할 수 있는 판단은?

A town library used to place its most frequently borrowed books near the entrance. This arrangement helped visitors who already knew what they wanted, but it gave little attention to unfamiliar titles. The librarian therefore introduced a small display pairing a popular book with a less familiar one on a related subject. She did not remove the usual shelves or require anyone to choose from the display. During the following month, some visitors borrowed books they had not previously considered. The total number of loans changed little, however. The librarian called the trial useful because it widened some readers' choices, not because it produced a dramatic increase in borrowing. Whether the effect would last remained an open question.

① The display permanently changed every visitor’s habits.② Some readers explored unfamiliar books, but lasting change was not established.③ The library removed its regular shelves.④ The display was useless because loans did not double.⑤ Readers were prohibited from borrowing familiar titles.

중5점 · 독해 · 인과 추론7. 첫 실험만으로 빛의 효과를 확정할 수 없는 이유는?

Two classes planted seeds from the same packet in identical pots. One class placed its pots by a window; the other kept them in a darker room. The first class watered its plants every day, while the second watered them only twice a week. After a month, the plants by the window were taller. A student concluded that the extra light alone had caused the difference. Her teacher pointed out that the groups differed in more than one respect. To investigate the effect of light, the students would need to keep the watering schedule the same and change only the light conditions. The first trial was not useless: it had generated a question worth testing. It simply could not settle the causal claim the student wanted to make.

① The students used different kinds of seeds.② No plant grew during the trial.③ Both light and watering frequency differed between groups.④ The pots were made from different materials.⑤ The teacher prohibited all comparisons.

상5점 · 독해 · 새 사례 적용8. 교사의 원칙에 가장 적절한 후속 실험은?

Two classes planted seeds from the same packet in identical pots. One class placed its pots by a window; the other kept them in a darker room. The first class watered its plants every day, while the second watered them only twice a week. After a month, the plants by the window were taller. A student concluded that the extra light alone had caused the difference. Her teacher pointed out that the groups differed in more than one respect. To investigate the effect of light, the students would need to keep the watering schedule the same and change only the light conditions. The first trial was not useless: it had generated a question worth testing. It simply could not settle the causal claim the student wanted to make.

① Use different seeds and change both light and water.② Move all pots into darkness and stop watering them.③ Compare last year’s outdoor plants with new indoor plants.④ Keep seeds, pots, and watering alike while varying light exposure.⑤ Water the brighter group more often to enlarge the difference.

상5점 · 독해 · 빈칸 추론9. 다음 요약의 빈칸에 알맞은 것은? A useful simplification preserves ( ).

A walking map of a town does not need to show everything that a visitor could possibly see. If every drain, fence, and lamp were marked with equal emphasis, the map might become harder to use. A useful map selects details according to its purpose. Yet leaving something out is not always harmless. A map designed for visitors using wheelchairs should identify stairs and steep paths, even if these features seem unimportant to other walkers. Thus, simplicity is not merely a matter of reducing the number of marks on a page. It requires deciding which distinctions the intended user needs in order to act. A map can be visually clean and still fail if it removes precisely those distinctions.

① the distinctions needed by its intended users② every visible object regardless of purpose③ only the features easiest to draw④ the same details for every possible audience⑤ as few marks as physically possible

상5점 · 독해 · 비판적 적용10. 글의 관점에서 가장 문제가 있는 지도는?

A walking map of a town does not need to show everything that a visitor could possibly see. If every drain, fence, and lamp were marked with equal emphasis, the map might become harder to use. A useful map selects details according to its purpose. Yet leaving something out is not always harmless. A map designed for visitors using wheelchairs should identify stairs and steep paths, even if these features seem unimportant to other walkers. Thus, simplicity is not merely a matter of reducing the number of marks on a page. It requires deciding which distinctions the intended user needs in order to act. A map can be visually clean and still fail if it removes precisely those distinctions.

① A map highlights station entrances for train passengers.② A map omits drains irrelevant to its stated walking route.③ A cycling map shows steep hills.④ A tourist map gives greater emphasis to landmarks.⑤ A wheelchair route map removes stairs to look less crowded.

중5점 · 독해 · 제목11. 가장 적절한 제목은?

A school asked students to estimate how well they remembered a science explanation. Many felt confident immediately after reading it because the wording seemed familiar. The next day, without the text in front of them, some could not explain the process. The teacher then changed the review routine. Students first closed the book and wrote an explanation from memory. They next reopened it, compared their accounts with the original, and corrected omissions. This did not make every first attempt accurate. Instead, it made missing knowledge visible while there was still time to repair it. Reading remained part of the routine, but the feeling of familiarity was no longer treated as sufficient evidence that learning had lasted.

① Why Reading Should Disappear from Classrooms② From Familiar Words to Evidence of Remembering③ The Perfect First Attempt: A New Requirement④ How to Avoid Discovering Gaps in Knowledge⑤ Confidence Makes Every Explanation Correct

상5점 · 독해 · 복합 추론12. 글의 원칙을 정확히 적용한 학생은?

A school asked students to estimate how well they remembered a science explanation. Many felt confident immediately after reading it because the wording seemed familiar. The next day, without the text in front of them, some could not explain the process. The teacher then changed the review routine. Students first closed the book and wrote an explanation from memory. They next reopened it, compared their accounts with the original, and corrected omissions. This did not make every first attempt accurate. Instead, it made missing knowledge visible while there was still time to repair it. Reading remained part of the routine, but the feeling of familiarity was no longer treated as sufficient evidence that learning had lasted.

① 해설을 여러 번 읽어 익숙해졌으므로 다음 날 점검은 생략한다.② 기억으로 쓴 첫 설명이 틀렸으므로 읽기와 재검토는 모두 중단한다.③ 자료를 덮고 설명한 뒤 누락을 교정하고, 다음 날 다시 설명할 수 있는지 확인한다.④ 책을 보며 문장을 베끼고 이를 독립적인 기억의 증거라고 본다.⑤ 첫 시도에서 틀린 부분은 숨기고 자신 있는 내용만 확인한다.