과천외고 1학년 영어 고급 어휘: attribute·ascribe·credit에서 원인과 공로를 뒤집지 않는 법 실전문제

자체 제작 실전형 변형문제 · 실제 학교·수능·편입 기출이 아닙니다.

전 문항을 선택하고 제출한 뒤에 점수·정답·근거 해설이 나타납니다. 총 100점, 통과 기준 80점입니다.

0 / 4 선택

난이도 하 15점1. Which account preserves the difference between the first explanation and the later finding?

The gardeners first attributed the yellow leaves to a dry week. A later soil test showed that the beds had received enough water, while damaged roots had prevented the young trees from taking up nutrients.

① The gardeners initially blamed drought, but the later test pointed to damaged roots.② The gardeners initially blamed the roots, but later found that the beds were dry.③ The yellow leaves were caused by an unusually wet week.④ The roots were repaired before the leaves turned yellow.⑤ The soil test confirmed that lack of water was the only cause.

난이도 중 20점2. What exactly was Juri credited with?

The school credited Juri with keeping the choir together during the blackout. A technician restored the lights, but Juri had continued to play the piano so that the singers did not lose time.

① Restoring the lights in the hall② Causing the blackout during the concert③ Maintaining the singers' timing through her playing④ Writing a report about the technician⑤ Replacing the piano after the lights returned

난이도 상 25점3. Which statement best distinguishes authorship from preservation?

An early catalog ascribed the unsigned sketch to Mira. When restorers uncovered a note beneath the frame, they reassigned the sketch to Mira's teacher. The catalog still credited Mira with preserving the sketch during the flood, an act quite separate from drawing it.

① Mira both drew and preserved the sketch, as the final catalog confirms.② The teacher preserved the sketch, whereas Mira merely wrote the hidden note.③ The final attribution concerns the teacher as artist; Mira is credited for saving the object.④ Because Mira saved the sketch, she must have drawn it originally.⑤ The restoration team withdrew every form of credit from Mira.

난이도 수능 이상 40점4. Which is the most defensible reading of the competing attributions?

The town paper attributed the fall in river traffic to a new bridge. Its chart, however, counted only passenger boats. Freight boats continued to use the river, while a separate report credited the bridge team with shortening road journeys. A later review ascribed the decline in passenger boats partly to a temporary closure of the riverside market, but did not measure the bridge's effect on those boats.

① The bridge caused a decline in all river traffic because passenger boats fell.② The market closure is established as the sole cause of lower passenger-boat use.③ The bridge team's road achievement proves that the bridge had no effect on boats.④ The paper's broad river-traffic claim exceeds its passenger-boat chart, and the later review offers a partial explanation without isolating the bridge's effect.⑤ Freight boats were included in the chart and declined at the same rate as passenger boats.

채점 뒤 ClassOn에 저장으로 이동하여 본인 답안을 확인하고 직접 저장할 수 있습니다. 저장 성공 전에는 기록 완료로 표시하지 않습니다.